The Law Commission, in its latest report, has highlighted the deficiencies of Epidemics Diseases Act and proposed essential reforms to ensure a robust legal framework for managing epidemics.
Background
Background and Context
The Epidemic Diseases Act was enacted during the colonial era to empower authorities to take necessary measures to control infectious diseases.
Over time, it has undergone amendments.
Key Recommendations
The Law Commission’s report emphasizes the following key dimensions:
Overhaul of the Act
- The existing Act exhibits “significant deficiencies” in handling containment and management of epidemics. The Commission recommends either suitable amendments to address existing gaps or the formulation of a comprehensive legislation specifically designed to tackle future epidemics.
Defining an ‘Epidemic’
- A clear definition of an ‘epidemic’ is crucial. The amended law or the new legislation should demarcate the stages of disease progression, including “outbreak,” “epidemic,” and “pandemic.” This clarity will guide authorities in implementing appropriate measures at each stage.
Roles of Central, State, and Local Authorities
- The proposed legislation should formulate an Epidemic Plan that clearly defines the roles and responsibilities of central, state, and local authorities. Consultation with stakeholders, including private hospitals and experts, during the drafting process is essential.
Response Mechanisms
- The new law should go beyond granting stipulated powers to the government. It must shape appropriate response mechanisms for preventing and controlling epidemic diseases. Scientific advancements should inform these mechanisms, ensuring a coordinated approach.
Clarification of Terms
To avoid ambiguity, the legislation should clearly differentiate between terms like ‘quarantine’ and ‘isolation’. Precise definitions will enhance effective implementation during health crises.
Read the full articel here: https://iasscore.in/current-affairs/strengthening-indias-epidemic-preparedness